The Circular Polarizer is on of the few remaining filters that can’t be replaced with Photoshop after the fact (though, scientists are working on it). However, just this summer I have seen several people keeping them permanently attached to their camera’s lens to protect the front glass. While it might be saving their lens, it might be ruining some of their photos.
There are several benefits to using a CP filter. It lets you control reflections on shiny surfaces in your photos, and it can even cut down on the atmospheric haze that can wash our precious contrast from your photos. But, it comes at a price. Most circular polarizing filters will block one-to-two full stops of light from coming into your lens.
In some instances, that reduction in light can be a positive. If you want to shoot wide open in bright sunlight or if you’re trying to use a long shutter speed to blur moving water during the day, it's a desirable effect. But, in many situations, it’s going to hurt, forcing you to crank your ISO higher than you normally would, or even worse, pushing down your shutter speed and giving you blurry images.
So, what do you do if you want to protect the front element of your lens without eating into your light? A standard UV filter is a popular choice because it transmits nearly all light straight through to the lens without shifting its color or quality. There are also special filters like the Hoya Protector specifically designed to protect the front element of your lens without changing the way your pictures look. There are also many people out there who adamantly oppose the use of any always-on filter because of their potential to degrade image quality even slightly.
I had to push to ISO 4,000 at F/2.8 to get a fast enough shutter speed to freeze this athletes hair in place. Using a circular polarizer, I would have had to push to ISO 8,000, or even higher.
The most recent example of this phenomenon I saw was at an athletic competition held in an old armory building. Big windows at each end provided beautiful light, but not nearly enough of it to capture fast-moving athletes without seriously cranking the ISO. One of the other photographers was using a mid-level DSLR with a kit lens. He remarked about how hard it was to get sharp photos and I noticed how dark his front lens element looked. He was hesitant to take the filter off, wanting to protect his lens from the sweat that was flying in the venue, but he eventually did and later came to tell me how much easier it was to shoot.
So, while it's not a bad idea to keep your lens protected, it's important to pick the right tool for the job.
from Popular Photography http://ift.tt/1LO9f0g
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment